The article discusses the Linear No-Threshold (LNT) model, which posits that any exposure to ionizing radiation carries a cancer risk, arguing that this framework exaggerates the dangers of radiation and hinders the development of CO2-free nuclear energy. It points out that natural radiation levels vary widely without correlating to increased cancer risks in certain high-exposure areas, like Kerala, India, and Denver, Colorado. The piece challenges the validity of LNT by citing studies showing lower mortality rates among radiologists exposed to higher radiation and highlights evidence of beneficial effects from low radiation doses, known as radiation hormesis. The author argues for a reevaluation of the LNT model due to scientifically flawed foundations and past misconduct by its proponents, advocating for a more balanced approach to radiation safety that reflects real-world risks.
Fri, 04 Oct 2024 10:00:28 GMT | Mackinac Center for Public Policy